31 January 2013

Hello again, it’s me, Peggy

Here is another update in my true story of how patients are treated by medics and solicitors when litigation is brought against a colleague of theirs. Not only are you mal-treated by medics but they are assisted by solicitors and the system, thereby allowing the legal profession to fill their greedy pockets.

On perusing the vast amount of files on my case it makes me shudder to think of what they have all done to me, and could and/or have done to you one way or another if you have pursued litigation against any member of the medical profession. It works the same way with solicitors in 99.9 cases out of 100, and lands up with the legal profession coming out of the process with many times more than the claimant, and that’s if the claimant comes out of it with anything.

Another true incident, one that I overheard whilst waiting in court for my own case to be heard when I was acting as Litigant in Person. Two Barristers was sat talking just behind me, and I overheard the Defendant’s Barrister say to the Claimant’s Barrister; “My client (The Defendant) is willing to settle this case by offering your client £175K”. The Barrister for the Claimant retorted, “Oh, don’t do that, I can get her to settle for a lot less than that”. British Justice, I don’t think so!!!

In this next section I want to show you what happened with the applications made to the Legal Services Commission for funding my case, and how my solicitor, Jonathon Brain at Mills Kemp & Brown Solicitors in Barnsley conspired with solicitor Carolyn Smiley at the Legal Services Commission to divert my mail, as intended for my information from the LSC, to C/o Mills Kemp & Brown Solicitors, to prevent my knowing that my funding certificate was LIVE and had been up-graded from Investigative Help to "FULL REPRESENTATION".

The reference number for funding by the LSC IN 2004 was DUORNAYY1943/A/W/8. You can see from the document copied below that the letter from the Legal Services Commission dated 18/5/2004 addressed to me C/o Mills Kemp & Brown … and thanking me for telling them about my change of address to, who else but; Yes, “Mills Kemp & Brown” was actually done under the guise of an abandoned LSC reference number, that of DUORNAYY1943/A/W/12. Now that surely has to be a case of FRAUD, with intent to pervert the course of justice!

Of course, I never received that letter because it went direct to Mills Kemp & Brown Solicitors. I discovered it sometime later when I requested to view the MKB files with a view of having certain documents copied. I could not believe my eyes when I saw it because Mr Brain was supposed to working in my interest and was being paid handsomely by the LSC for so doing.

See below copies of the relevant letters showing what I say hear is true:

                

 

See copy of the subsequent Funding Certificate itself and copied below, as sent onto Mills Kemp & Brown. It is dated 07.06.2004 and on that date it had been upgraded from Investigative Help to "FULL REPRESENTATION" You can also see that they have reverted back to the correct reference number of DURNAYY1943/A/W/8. You can also see that they have reverted back to the correct reference number of DURNAYY1943/A/W/8. You can also see that Mr M Zeraati was a named opponent in my case yet Mr Brain went on to draw up a Witness Statement for Mr M Zeraati (Under a fictitious Court Reference number) and this while he was being funded by the LSC. Now, that surely has to be a criminal offence, what???



 

See below a copy of my letter of complaint to Mr Andy Grant (Regional Director) LSC London. Note my letter contains the correct LSC reference number:

On the 6^th August 2004 I received a letter dated 5^th August 2004 in what I consider to have been an ambiguous apology from LSC Manager Mr Peter Monaghan. You will see, however, that he says that in retrospect we now feel that this was an inappropriate step which we regret having taken. No good saying that when you’re caught-out is it, yuh Honour?? This was a fraudulent act and they still think they’ve got away with it. See copy of letter of apology copied below:

The next six pages (images) are copies of my complaint letter to the LSC, dated 6^th July 2006. I believe they tell their own story.







The above is only a very small extract taken from the LSC File and I intend returning to the LSC file later-on in this true story, together with the evidence mentioned in my complaint letter.

This true story continues …

NB: All copyrights reserved