Sunday, February 9, 2014

9th February 2014 [Blog No. 44]

Hello again, it’s me, Peggy


I met with the Rt. Hon Sir Kevin J Barron MP on Saturday (8/2/2014) after him bringing my complaint against the PHSO up in the House of Commons on 6/2/2014. See copy of my letter below.


I have responded by email to Dr Daniel Poulter, commenting on his Webpage link relating to the transcript of the House of Commons debate on 6/2/2014 on Mrs M Barnes Treatment by the NHS. See copy of my email copied below.

Dear Dr Poulter

I wish to take this opportunity here to respond to your Webpage. Dr Dan's work in Parliament MRS M. Barnes (NHS Treatment) (6 Feb 2014)

Firstly, Dr Poulter, I would like say how skilfully you put-over the hatchet job done on my PHSO complaint by the civil servants who drafted your speech. However, I use the term “skilfully” loosely because your civil servants simply tried to discredit me personally, as opposed to them and you considering the single issue put to the PHSO by The Rt. Hon Sir Kevin J Barron MP. That was the issue of the Kiveton Primary Care Centre (KPPCC) not amending my medical records in 2002, in accordance with the advice they received from the Information Commissioner at that time.

I had, since having a botched operation on my Right knee in 1987, tried to obtain proper corrective treatment from several medical professionals, via my GP. However, when I reviewed my medical records it was discovered that my records contained reference to litigation issues, and the same reference had been made in letters of referral from my GP to other Healthcare Providers since 1990 and the reason for me not being able to obtain the required treatment. I had referred this data issue to the Information Commissioner (ICO) in September 2002, and my complaint was upheld.

It was noted in your speech that during your berating and while trying to discredit me, you yourself made reference to previous litigation having taken place over the years, just the same as the KPPCC and earlier GPs had done in letters of referral since 1990.

You also referred to Judge Simon throwing out my Clinical Negligence case (a totally different matter) but what you failed to mention in any event was the matter of HHJ Moore (in 5th September 2005, at an earlier Hearing) and him having directed Browne Jacobson Solicitors (in Court) that the Defendant Trust had a case to answer and to get the case settled. The judge instructed the Court Clerk to pass back to us (including Browne Jacobson solicitors) all the court case files, which he did (including those filed into court) albeit we thought HHJ Moore’s actions in doing that to be highly irregular. HHJ Moore further directed me to listen to my husband and not to be too picky and wanting every penny. This fact is actually written in HHJ Moore’s transcript of the Court Hearing for 5/9/2005.

I know it’s getting away from the single PHSO issue but it has to be said that a Part 36 offer to settle the clinical negligence claim was drawn-up by me with the aid of Mr Barron MP, and then served on the Defendant’s solicitors. The offer to settle was disregarded/ignored by Browne Jacobson solicitors (contrary to HHJ Moore’s Directions on 5/9/2005) and the case, therefore, had to be returned to court.

I discovered in early 2011, that my medical records had been returned back to the KPPCC via the South Riding Health Services Support Agency (SRHSSA).

I reiterate here, the issue of the KPPCC not amending my medical records back in 2002 was the single issue as put to the PHSO by Mr Barron MP in September 2011, together with several documents dating back 20-odd years, and some more recent, as supporting evidence showing how the offending data had been discriminatory against me and used to block me from obtaining proper treatment for my knee, and subsequently, my ongoing Right foot problem.

The complaint against the KPPCC was given PHSO Ref No. EN-118242. I mention this here because it has been confirmed by the PHSO (in a sound recorded telephone conversation) that the same reference number followed the case through to the end, and yet the PHSO in December 2012, for some reason, one better known to them, changed the case reference number to EN-148574.

Mr Barron MP, as he said in the House on 6/2/2014, had received a letter dated 10 March 2012 from Chief Executive (NHS Rotherham) confirming my medical records had been retrieved from the SRHSSA by the KPPCC for amendment in order for them to comply with the ICO’s advice (which they had received in year 2002). Mr Buck confirmed in his letter that amending my medical records had taken the KPPCC several weeks (around 6-weeks) because implementing the Commissioner’s advice was onerous.

You, Dr Poulter, go on in furthering your attempts to discredit me by accusing me of theft and/or obtaining my medical records by other criminal means, and I quote from your Webpage; My hon. Friend will be aware that patients have open access to their records and can request to see them, but it is not for a patient forcibly to remove relevant clinical information from them”.

All the data evidence, including x-rays, scans and reports that I have obtained from the medical professionals has been done via legitimate legal means at all times.  
Mind you, I bet you cannot believe how I have managed to come by such comprehensive and damming data in my medical records and/or x-rays/reports. However, I can assure you the aforementioned medical records were obtained via legitimate legal means at all times.

I decided to go public on this matter because I felt I had nothing further to lose due to the wilful negligence by the KPPCC and those that went before them since 1990 having caused me unrecoverable damage to my quality of life by referring to past litigation issues in letters of referral.

I understand, Dr Poulter, you intend writing to Mr Barron MP since him clarifying various issues with you after the House adjourned on 6/2/2014.

See my blog for the full and true on-going story: http://moniqueannbarnes.blogspot.com/

Comments made by Mrs M A Barnes (9/2/2014).

Your Sincerely


M A Barnes
6, Pine Avenue
South Anston
Sheffield
S25 5HA



For your information: See link to House of Commons debate on Mrs M Barnes NHS Treatment – 6/2/2014: http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=speaker%3A10027+section:debate&o=d

To see the actual debate click on this link: http://www.bbc.co.uk/i/b03ty9bk/?t=5h21m25s

This true story continues …….

NB: All copyrights reserved   


No comments:

Post a Comment