17^th November 2013 [Blog No. 40]

Hello again, it’s me, Peggy

I believe it’s not before time that “Wilful Negligence” by Medics in our NHS is to be criminalised. That would certainly have made those medics think twice who conspired to prevent me obtaining proper corrective treatment for my knee, and subsequently my Right foot problem in my case. Which was due to me entering Orthopaedic Surgeon Mr Majumdar (and subsequently others) into litigation?

You can see from my previous blogs that my cases had been fraught with medics wilfully blocking me from obtaining treatment by them denying x-rays existed as far back as 1988 and 1991 showing a bony lesion to be in my Right knee at that time, and the reason for me suffering the crippling pain in my knee.

Solicitors alike conspired to prevent my cases getting into court with Legal Representation. Maybe they should be next to be criminalised when found to be just ripping-off their clients and/or the LSC system.

I’d had a bellyful of these twisted solicitors, and as you can see there have been many instructed on my case, so I decided to take the breach of Data Protection Act 1998 by the Kiveton Primary Care Centre matter to the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman, with the help of our Local MP.

However, even though I put this matter to the PHSO via our Local MP, The Rt. Hon Mr Kevin J Barron MP, there was still conspiracy seen to be operating in the PHSO Quango and I am hoping to show you here just how they did what they did to prevent paying-out any compensation in the KPPCC issue. Mr Barron had said that I would be paid-out this way but it would not be as much as could be expected if it went via the courts.

However, they changed their reference numbers half-way-through the case so as to enable them disregard evidence put to them at the onset. Even Mr Barron MP referred to the PHSO as resorting to “Tricks”. Now, why should the PHSO resort to tricks if not to cover the backs of the medics?

The first letter was sent to the PHSO in October 2011 but it was just disregarded. It was put into what they call a holding file by Mr Lea Hedges, hoping it would just go away. Mr Barron MP seemed to think it taking the PHSO such a long time to respond over the KPPCC matter was encouraging. However, I now understand from what Mr Barron MP said, Mr Lea Hedges no-longer works for the PHSO.

In December 2011 I asked Mr Barron to chase-up the PHSO. It took the Ombudsman nearly 5-months to respond. See copy of PHSO letters dated 28 March 2012 copied below. I am copying in the MP and PHSO letters here for year 2012, as opposed to telling you the story, because you should find them self-explicit.

The Health Service Ombudsman responded under complaint Ref: EN-118242

Mr Barron MP responded in a letter dated 3^rd April 2012

Copied below is Ombudsman’s response dated 17/4/2012 under Ref: EN-118242

I received a copy of the response from the KPPCC dated 24 September 2012 with a denial and rejecting my claim for compensation. The KPPCC had said the records were amended in 2003. However, Mr Andy Buck (Chief Executive) Rotherham Primary Care Trust confirmed in his letter to Mr Barron MP (Dated 10 March 2011) that the reason for the delay in the KPPCC amending my medical records (it had taken from November 2010 to March 2011) was that it had been an onerous task.

Mr Barron received a response in the Ombudsman’s letter dated 26/9/2012 still under complaint Ref: EN-118242

Mr Barron MP received my letter together with the response from the KPPCC dated 24/9/2012 which for some reason had been delayed and not sent until after the PHSO had made a telephone call to the KPPCC, and to which the PHSO had not obtained my consent before so-doing!

On 29^th October 2012 I received a copy of a letter from Mr Charles J Hazel (Business Manager) KPPCC apologising for it taking from November 2010 to March 2011 to review my medical records. However, as I have contended in my blogs previously, the mere fact they were sent to my new GP in November 2010 prior to being amended had continued to convey to the new GP the issues regarding previous litigation. Wilfully, a back covering culture, yes?

On 13^th November 2012 Mr Barron MP wrote to the PHSO urging a response, and he received a response in a letter dated 16/11/2012 but what had happened here was that the PHSO had subtly changed their reference number for this case from EN-118242 to EN-148574. When my husband telephoned the PHSO it was confirmed (in a sound recorded telephone conversation) that the case reference number always remains with the case throughout, from beginning to end. Now what does this tell you. Simply that the back covering culture continues!

The Ombudsman referred to them wanting a new complaint form filling in. What planet are these people on?

The next letter refers to them now writing to the KPPCC requesting copies of paperwork, and this after a year has gone by in any event!!

In my next blog I will show you how in year 2013 they PHSO writes requesting further information after informing me that I have furnished them with too much information. If I have given them too much why should they be asking for more information?  

This true story continues …….

NB: All copyrights reserved